Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Netflix on Monday, alleging the streaming service illegally collected and sold users’ personal data without consent, violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
A federal judge in New York denied Bayer’s attempt to decertify a class action alleging the company’s gummy vitamins deceptively implied a one-pill daily serving size.
Connecticut secured a settlement with an international trade platform to stop the sale of unapproved GLP-1 weight loss drugs to U.S. consumers.
A California consumer says the infomercial giant ran a perpetual "76% OFF" sale on its website that was never actually a sale.
Three consumers who say a frozen-fish manufacturer added a chemical preservative and water to its fillets — then labeled them "100% Whole Fish Fillets" — get to press their case.
A Kentucky federal judge ordered plaintiffs' lawyers to address a key Sixth Circuit ruling on commonality — even after being told to do so once before.
New York's attorney general settled with the cryptocurrency platform after it marketed a product backed by risky micro-loans to video game players in China as a reliable savings vehicle.
A San Diego federal judge found that Ashlynn Marketing Group deleted its kratom-product blog during active litigation and then watched Wayback Machine archives prove it.
A Chicago woman whose discharged debts kept showing up as past due on her credit report can still pursue one theory against Experian — just not the one that would have required the agency to comb through bankruptcy dockets.
A Utah man testified that debt-collection letters sent without required federal disclosures caused him extreme stress and panic, triggered suicidal thoughts, and strained his family relationships.
A company that told federal regulators it knew of only two fire incidents had actually logged at least 16 — and kept selling the units anyway.
A Colorado federal judge let most claims stand against a fertility provider hit by a ransomware gang that published patients' intimate reproductive records on the dark web, but only one plaintiff's out-of-pocket monitoring costs cleared the injury bar for n...
Judge Jon S. Tigar granted California’s motion to remand a consumer protection and public nuisance suit against major food manufacturers, holding that the state—not San Francisco—is the real party in interest for diversity jurisdiction purposes.
A Northern District of California judge dismissed nearly all claims in a putative class action against Canyon Bicycles over a fire hazard recall and "German engineered" marketing claims, but allowed the breach of implied warranty of merchantability claim to...
Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden granted partial summary judgment in favor of ALPR contractor Securix, LLC, dismissing all abuse-of-process claims and one plaintiff’s unjust-enrichment claim in a suit challenging the company’s electronic license plate monitorin...
New Jersey's consumer-fraud claims against Discord for collecting children's data without parental consent are state-law claims, a federal district court held, even though they borrow a federal standard — and belong in state court.
A Northern District of California court held that Babylist's sign-up page gave consumers legally sufficient notice of its arbitration clause, sending privacy claims to JAMS and out of federal court.
A Texas federal judge certified a class and approved a settlement resolving claims that Mortgage Contracting Services exposed employees' and customers' personal data in an alleged December 2023 cyberattack.
A published Sixth Circuit ruling holds that an Oklahoma debt-collection law firm purposefully availed itself of Michigan by garnishing the wages of a Michigan employee, reversing a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction.